
HT: Raconteur

Ever wondered how much time the average person spends looking at their TV, computer, phone or laptop? Well, this chart shows exactly that, broken down by country.
Produced by Mary Meeker for her annual presentation on internet trends, the chart reveals some interesting insights. Clearly Indonesia and the Philippines are glued to their screens, but it’s the breakdown where it get interesting. Look at the disparity in TV viewing between the U.S. and Vietnam, say, despite their similar totals; or the lack of tablet time in South Korea. (But then, maybe that’s because Samsung tablet suck.) And Italy and France barely spend any time at a screen—but then, maybe that’s what happens if you ban email after 6pm. [KPCB via Quartz]

Source: Teradata and EIU
Nearly half of CEOs believe that all of their employees have access to the data they need, but only 27% of employees agree.
That’s according to study results from Teradata, a data analytics and marketing firm. The company commissioned The Economist Intelligence Unit to survey 362 workers across the globe — including those in management, finance, sales and marketing, business development and more.
CEOs also overestimate how quickly “big data” moves through their company, with 43% of CEO respondents believing that relevant data is made available in real-time, compared to 29% of all respondents.
Overall, CEOs are wearing rose-colored glasses when examining the overall effectiveness big data has on their initiatives: 38% believe their employees are able to extract relevant insights from the data, while only 24% of all respondents do.
The report notes that of companies that outperform in profitability as a result of data-driven marketing, 63% of the initiatives are launched by corporate leadership, and 41% have a centralized data and analytics group. Of companies that say they underperform, 38% of initiatives are launched by the higher-ups and 28% say data and analytics are centralized.

Kirsten Newbold-Knipp, Gartner:
Here are a few highlights from some of our 2016 marketing cool vendors reports as well as guidance on technology selection.

ComTIA:
CompTIA evaluates trends for its IT Industry Outlook based on their recent or imminent impact. For developments that are just emerging, or trends that are still on under the radar, Buzzwords Watch provides a glimpse of terms that could gain traction. Of course, many will also fizzle out.
Note: CompTIA’s Buzzword Watch is not meant to be a formal, quantitative assessment of trends, but rather an informal look at interesting concepts that may be worth paying attention to in the year ahead.

HT: @NinjaEconomics
See also: Cleaning Big Data: Most Time-Consuming, Least Enjoyable Data Science Task, Survey
In its most recent hype cycle for emerging technologies, Gartner introduced “citizen data science” and “advanced analytics with self-service delivery.” Both technologies were predicted to reach the “plateau of productivity” in 2 to 5 years before
The shortage of data scientists and the resulting high salaries they command is giving rise to new self-service tools, automating all stages of data science so business analysts, marketing managers, IT staff and others could perform advanced analytics as part of their jobs.
By 2017, Gartner says, the number of these citizen data scientists in small and large organizations will grow five times faster than the number of highly skilled data scientists. Forrester agrees that the “huge demand” for data scientists will not be met in the short term, “even as more degree programs launch globally.” And the demand for advanced data analysis will only increase in the coming years with the rise of the Internet of Things.
Automation also helps the few overworked data scientists available today, making the experienced more productive and helping the newly-minted add value faster. A number of startups, such as Trifacta and Tamr, have focused on the early stages of the data analytics process—data preparation and transformation—and others have focused on later stages such as data visualization or on specific applications and industries.
An interesting challenge is automating the core of the data science process, the development and maintenance of predictive models (Forrester recently declared that Predictive Analytics is the hottest big data technology). The founders of DMway, which recently raised $1 million dollars in seed funding from JVP Labs, have “spent their entire careers on understanding and mapping the methods of algorithm and model developers,” says CEO Gil Nizri.
“Predictive analytics is a great competitive differentiator but it is still beyond the reach of most organizations,” adds Nizri. “DMway is enabling any size company, from SMB to enterprise, to compete on a level playing field.”
DMway’s model building “mimics the way a human expert develops a model,” says CTO Ronen Meiri. It starts by exploring the data, searching through all potential predictors and selecting the most influential. Using the set of influential predictors it creates a final prediction model and then applies it to an independent dataset to check its accuracy and over-fitting, making sure the model is general enough to apply to new observations. Finally, it provides multiple methods for seamless integration and deployment of the model.
The result is faster model development and more accurate models, sometimes 20% more accurate than traditionally-developed models. The benefits of automation, however, do not apply only to the initial development of the model. “Most of the resources are going to model maintenance and not to building the model for the first time,” says Meiri. “In micro-financing, for example, they usually re-build the model every three months.”
Businesses operating in environments with fast-changing conditions are prime candidates for automated model maintenance and a number of DMway’s early customers are Fintech startups. BACKED, providing loans to young Americans, uses DMway to predict loan defaults and Fido Credit, provider of micro-financing in Africa, uses DMway to assess credit risk. Beyond the financial sector, DMway’s automated model development is used by the marketing department of YES, a Cable TV operator, to predict customer churn and facilitate lead conversion.
As Eric Siegel, founder of Predictive Analytics World and author of Predictive Analytics: The Power to Predict Who Will Click, Buy, Lie, or Die, declaimed in a previous version of this rap video:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSP3z0LmWEg?rel=0]
Modeling means modifying models incrementally,
With a geek technique to tweak, it will reach the peak eventually.
Each step is taken to improve prediction on the training cases,
One small step for man; one giant leap—the human race is going places!
DMway is a good example of how automation is best discussed as human augmentation rather than human replacement, as it facilitates analyst-machine collaboration. The human race may indeed go places when data scientists—both of the highly skilled and of the “citizen” varieties—are supplied with tools that increase their productivity and the accuracy of models that drive decisions.
Originally published on Forbes.com
A new survey of data scientists found that they spend most of their time massaging rather than mining or modeling data. Still, most are happy with having the sexiest job of the 21st century. The survey of about 80 data scientists was conducted for the second year in a row by CrowdFlower, provider of a “data enrichment” platform for data scientists. Here are the highlights:
Data preparation accounts for about 80% of the work of data scientists
Data scientists spend 60% of their time on cleaning and organizing data. Collecting data sets comes second at 19% of their time, meaning data scientists spend around 80% of their time on preparing and managing data for analysis.
76% of data scientists view data preparation as the least enjoyable part of their work
57% of data scientists regard cleaning and organizing data as the least enjoyable part of their work and 19% say this about collecting data sets.
These findings are yet another confirmation of a very widely known and lamented fact of the data scientist’s work experience. In 2009, data scientist Mike Driscoll popularized the term “data munging,” describing the “painful process of cleaning, parsing, and proofing one’s data” as one of the three sexy skills of data geeks. In 2013, Josh Wills (then director of Data Science at Cloudera, now Director of Data Engineering at Slack) told Technology Review “I’m a data janitor. That’s the sexiest job of the 21st century. It’s very flattering, but it’s also a little baffling.” And Big Data Borat tweeted that “Data Science is 99% preparation, 1% misinterpretation.”
Given that the median annual base salary in the U.S. of the hard-to-find and much-in-demand data scientists was $104,000 last year, a number of startups have focused on automating a solution to this essential but boring task. In his 2016 Big Data Landscape, Matt Turck lists a number of them in the “data transformation” box plus companies (such as CrowdFlower) that are addressing this need with crowdsourcing (both in the “infrastructure” section).
Investing in solutions to messy data will continue and IDC has predicted that through 2020, spending on self-service visual discovery and data preparation tools will grow 2.5x faster than traditional IT-controlled tools for similar functionality. Following the same trend, Forrester predicted that in 2016, machine learning will begin to replace manual “data wrangling” (another endearing term like “data munging”) and data governance dirty work, and that vendors will market these solutions as a way to make data ingestion, preparation, and discovery quicker.
Indeed, 55% of the respondents to the CrowdFlower survey agreed with Forrester, predicting that over the next year machine learning will have (or will continue to have) a significant importance for their companies and their departments.
Other findings:
35% of data scientists gave their job the highest mark possible.
Only 14% of data scientists felt they were being held back by their tools.
What data scientists want most is more support and direction from their management or executive team (27%).
Finally, CrowdFlower looked at nearly 4,000 data science job postings on LinkedIn to find out what skills organizations wanted from their new hires. Last year they found that the skills most in demand were programming and coding. This year, they looked for more specific data science tools that are mentioned in job posting.
Here are the Top 10 in-demand skills for data scientists:
| Skills | % of jobs with skill |
| SQL | 56% |
| Hadoop | 49% |
| Python | 39% |
| Java | 36% |
| R | 32% |
| Hive | 31% |
| Mapreduce | 22% |
| NoSQL | 18% |
| Pig | 16% |
| SAS | 16% |
I’m sure it is relatively easy for employers to test prospective data scientists for their proficiency in any of the above tools and data platforms. But how do they test for their efficiency in removing commas?
Originally published on Forbes.com
[vimeo 94011734 w=640 h=360]