
…a good lesson for Data Scientists is to question their assumptions and to be especially skeptical when predicting a rare event with limited history using human behavior.

…a good lesson for Data Scientists is to question their assumptions and to be especially skeptical when predicting a rare event with limited history using human behavior.

For the first time, a “one stop shop” of the machine intelligence stack is coming into view—even if it’s a year or two off from being neatly formalized. The maturing of that stack might explain why more established companies are more focused on building legitimate machine intelligence capabilities. Anyone who has their wits about them is still going to be making initial build-and-buy decisions, so we figured an early attempt at laying out these technologies is better than no attempt.
If this year’s landscape shows anything, it’s that the impact of machine intelligence is already here. Almost every industry is already being affected, from agriculture to transportation. Every employee can use machine intelligence to become more productive with tools that exist today. Companies have at their disposal, for the first time, the full set of building blocks to begin embedding machine intelligence in their businesses.
And unlike with the internet, where latecomers often bested those who were first to market, the companies that get started immediately with machine intelligence could enjoy a lasting advantage.

IDC:
[This is an] updated index ranking the Group of 20 (G20) nations on their preparedness for Internet of Things (IoT) development. The original index was first published in 2013 but this updated index is now comprised of 13 criteria that IDC views as necessary for sustained development of the IoT and reflects each nation’s economic stature, technological preparedness, and business readiness to benefit from the efficiencies linked to IoT solutions.
The United States, South Korea, and the United Kingdom ranked as the three countries most ready to generate and benefit from the IoT. The U.S. scored particularly well on measures such as ease of doing business, government effectiveness, innovation, and cloud infrastructure, as well as GDP and technology spending as a percent of GDP. South Korea, despite a modest GDP, scored extremely well on IoT-specific spending and has a business environment that fosters innovation and promotes attractive investment opportunities. Similarly, the U.K. scored very highly on measures of ease of doing business, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, start-up procedures, innovation, and broadband penetration.
The standout country in the ranking proved to be Australia, which, despite its relatively small GDP, scored exceptionally high on ease of doing business and start-up procedures, government effectiveness and regulatory quality, and innovation and education. Australia’s scores point to a country that has the necessary ingredients for a business environment that is ready for the growth of IoT.

Spending on mobile advertising in the US soared 89 per cent to $15.5bn in the first half of the year, taking up nearly half of online ad budgets, new data show. Mobile makes up 47 per cent of all online ad expenditures — up from 30 per cent a year ago and far surpassing the 19 per cent share taken by banner ads, according to a report from the Interactive Advertising Bureau and PwC, the professional services firm.


Source: PwC
On October 27, 1994, HotWired, the first commercial Web magazine, gave birth to the first Web banner ad and the Internet advertising industry. PwC predicts that Internet advertising revenues worldwide will surpass TV advertising in 2016 and reach $260.4 billion in 2020.
More about the first six online ads here. One of them, an ad for AT&T, simply said: “Have you ever clicked your mouse right HERE? You will!”




Here are my predictions for 2021.

Source: Greg Diamos and Sharan Narang, “The need for speed: Benchmarking deep learning workloads,” O’Reilly AI Conference
At the O’Reilly Artificial Intelligence conference, Baidu Research announced DeepBench, an open source benchmarking tool for evaluating the performance of deep learning operations on different hardware platforms. Greg Diamos and Sharan Narang of Baidu Research’s Silicon Valley AI Lab talked at the conference about the motivation for developing the benchmark and why faster computers are crucial to the continued success of deep learning.
The harbinger of the current AI Spring, deep learning is a machine learning method using “artificial neural networks,” moving vast amounts of data through many layers of hardware and software, each layer coming up with its own representation of the data and passing what it “learned” to the next layer. As a widely publicized deep learning project has demonstrated four years ago, feeding such an artificial neural network with images extracted from 10 million videos can result in the computer (in this case, an array of 16,000 processors) learning to identify and label correctly an image of a cat. One of the leaders of that “Google Brain” project was Andrew Ng, who is today the Chief Scientist at Baidu and the head of Baidu Research.
Research areas of interest to by Baidu Research include image recognition, speech recognition, natural language processing, robotics, and big data. Its Silicon Valley AI Lab has deep learning and systems research teams that work together “to explore the latest in deep learning algorithms as well as find innovative ways to accelerate AI research with new hardware and software technologies.”
DeepBench is an attempt to accelerate the development of the hardware foundation for deep learning, by helping hardware developers optimize their processors for deep learning applications, and specifically, for the “training” phase in which the system learns through trial and error. “There are many different types of applications in deep learning—if you are a hardware manufacturer, you may not understand how to build for them. We are providing a tool for people to help them see if a change to a processor [design] improves performance and how it affects the application,” says Diamos. One of the exciting things about deep learning for him (and no doubt for many other researchers) is that “as the computer gets faster, the application gets better and the algorithms get smarter.”
Case in point is speech recognition. Or more specifically, DeepSpeech, Baidu Research’s “state-of-the-art speech recognition system developed using end-to-end deep learning.” The most important aspect of this system is its simplicity, says Diamos, with audio on one end, text on the other end, and a single learning algorithm (a recurring convolutional neural network), sitting in the middle. “We can take exactly the same architecture and apply it to both English and Mandarin with greater accuracy than systems we were building in the past,” says Diamos.
In Mandarin, the system is more accurate in transcribing audio to text than native speakers, as the latter may have difficulty understanding what is said because of noise level or accent. Indeed, the data set used by DeepSpeech is very large because it was created by mixing hours of synthetic noise with the raw audio, explains Narang. The largest publicly available data set is about 2000 hours of audio recordings while the one used by DeepSpeech clocks in at 100,000 hours or 10 terabytes of data.
The approach taken by the developers of DeepSpeech is superior to other approaches argue Narang and Diamos. Traditional speech recognition systems using a “hand-designed algorithm,” get more accurate with more data but eventually saturate, requiring a domain expert to develop a new algorithm. The hybrid approach adds a deep convolutional neural network. The result is better scaling but again the performance eventually saturates. DeepSpeech uses deep learning as the entire algorithm and achieves continuous improvement in performance (accuracy) with larger data sets and larger models (more and bigger layers).
Bigger is better. But to capitalize on this feature (pun intended) of deep learning, you need faster computers. “The biggest bottleneck,” says Narang, “is training the model.” He concludes: “Large data sets, a complex model with many layers, and the need to train the model many times is slowing down deep learning research. To make rapid progress, we need to reduce model training time. That’s why we need tools to benchmark the performance of deep learning training. DeepBench allows us to measure the time it takes to perform the underlying deep learning operation. It establishes a line in the sand that will encourage hardware developers to do better by focusing on the right issues.”
Originally published on Forbes.com